Is Taking Pictures Haram?
Scholars differ on photography. Egypt's Dar al-Ifta and Ibn Uthaymin allow camera photos, while Ibn Baz and IslamQA forbid them except for need.
- Published
- Reviewed by
- Salah Home Operations Team
- Last reviewed
- Reading time
- 9 min read
Short answer
Scholars differ on taking pictures, and many permit camera photos of people and animals as long as the content is decent. Egypt's Dar al-Ifta (2013), Islamweb and Shaykh Ibn Uthaymin held that a camera captures Allah's creation rather than imitating it, while Shaykh Ibn Baz and IslamQA say photos of living beings are haram except for needs like ID cards. All agree that immodest photos are haram and photos of things without souls are permissible.
Phones have made photography part of almost every day: family dinners, a child's first steps, a passport renewal, a sunset on the way home. At the same time, many Muslims have heard that the Prophet ﷺ warned image-makers of severe punishment, and they are not sure whether that applies to the camera in their pocket.
The honest answer is that respected scholars disagree. This guide explains the hadith behind the question, the main positions and who holds them, and the points where every view lines up.
Is taking pictures haram in Islam?
Taking pictures of things without souls, like landscapes, buildings and food, is permissible according to all views; camera photos of people and animals are a matter of real scholarly disagreement. One group of scholars, including Egypt's Dar al-Ifta, Islamweb and Shaykh Ibn Uthaymin, holds that a camera photo is not the image-making the hadith forbid, because it captures what Allah created instead of inventing a likeness. Another group, including Shaykh Ibn Baz, the Saudi Standing Committee and IslamQA, holds that photos of living beings are haram except in cases of need.
Shaykh Muhammad ibn Adam al-Kawthari of Qibla.com describes the split this way: most Arab scholars from all four schools permit camera photos, while the overwhelming majority of scholars from the Indian subcontinent, including Mufti Taqi Usmani, forbid them. He calls it "a matter of genuine and valid difference of opinion."
What do the hadith say about making images?
Several authentic hadith warn image-makers of severe punishment, and they are the starting point for every view. The main narrations are:
- "The people who will receive the severest punishment from Allah will be the picture makers" (Sahih al-Bukhari 5950).
- "Those who make these pictures will be punished on the Day of Resurrection, and it will be said to them, 'Make alive what you have created'" (Sahih al-Bukhari 5951).
- When the Prophet ﷺ saw a curtain with pictures in Aisha's house, he tore it and said: "The people who will receive the severest punishment on the Day of Resurrection will be those who try to make the like of Allah's creations." She then turned it into one or two cushions (Sahih al-Bukhari 5954).
- "Angels (of Mercy) do not enter a house wherein there is a dog or a picture of a living creature" (Sahih al-Bukhari 3225).
When a man who made pictures for a living asked Ibn 'Abbas for a ruling, he narrated that the Prophet ﷺ said every image-maker would be in the Fire, then advised: "If you have to do it at all, then paint the pictures of trees and lifeless things" (Sahih Muslim 2110a). This is why scholars agree that images of things without souls are fine.
Why do some scholars say camera photos are allowed?
Scholars who permit photography say the hadith target people who imitate Allah's creation, and a camera does not create anything; it records light reflected from what Allah already made. Shaykh Ibn Uthaymin explained that instant camera images do "not come under the heading of image-making," but are "transmitting an image that Allaah has made by means of this machine," which he compared to a reflection or a photocopy of a letter, as quoted by IslamQA (answer 82366) from his Majmoo' Fataawa.
Egypt's Dar al-Ifta went further in a 2013 fatwa. It says the question of drawing and picturing humans "is from among the controversial issues and there is no objection to following any of the opinions," noting that Maliki scholars and some of the early generations limited the prohibition to full statues. It permits drawing people and animals and says it is "impermissible to paint or photograph nudity" or anything that must be covered.
Islamweb (fatwa 83249) also sides with those who allow camera and video photography when it has no forbidden content, "since the reason for which the photography of living beings is forbidden, i.e. imitating of Allah's Creation, does not exist." It still adds that avoiding photography is better, to stay clear of doubt.
Why do other scholars say photos of people are haram?
Scholars who forbid photos say the hadith make no exception for the tool used; an image of a living being is an image, whether drawn by hand or made by a camera. Shaykh Ibn Baz said that "depicting living beings is forbidden and not permissible, whether by photography or otherwise," except where dire necessity calls for it, such as photographing criminals so they can be caught. He said photos for walls, keepsakes or wedding parties have "no basis."
IslamQA (answer 10668) quotes the Saudi Standing Committee for Issuing Fatwas: the basic principle on images of any animate being is that it is haram, "whether the pictures are three-dimensional or are drawn on paper, cloth or walls, etc., or are photographs (taken with a camera)." It adds that images can lead to veneration and are "a kind of trying to match the creation of Allah." The same answer quotes Ibn Uthaymin saying that making pictures just for memories is haram, which shows that even scholars who did not class camera photos as image-making were cautious about taking them without a purpose.
How do the main positions on photography compare?
The scholars below split mainly over everyday photos of people; they agree on statues, immodest images and pictures of things without souls. Here is a summary:
| Scholar or body | Camera photos of people and animals | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt's Dar al-Ifta (2013) | Permissible | A disputed issue; nudity is impermissible |
| Islamweb (fatwa 83249) | Permissible if free of forbidden content | Avoiding it is better |
| Shaykh Ibn Uthaymin | Not the forbidden image-making | Photos just for memories are haram |
| Shaykh Ibn Baz | Haram | Only for dire necessity |
| Saudi Standing Committee, via IslamQA | Haram | Applies to camera photos too |
| Most Indo-Pak scholars, e.g. Mufti Taqi Usmani | Not permissible | Per Qibla.com's summary |
Is it haram to take pictures on your phone?
Many scholars, including some who forbid printed photos, say digital pictures on a phone fall outside the prohibition as long as they are not printed and contain nothing haram. IslamQA (answer 174965, 2012) says the prohibition applies to fixed images "on paper, fabric, walls and so on," while digital pictures from a mobile phone that "appear on the screen and then disappear" are "not included in this prohibition, as was stated by several scholars." It quotes Shaykh Dr. Khalid al-Mushayqih saying there is "nothing wrong with keeping them on the mobile phone so long as they do not include anything haraam."
The same answer still says it is not allowed to post pictures of women in chat rooms because of the risk of temptation. So even under the lenient view, what you photograph and who sees it still matter. Our guide on whether posting on TikTok is haram covers sharing photos and videos online.
What kinds of pictures are haram according to all scholars?
All the positions above agree that some pictures are haram no matter how they are made. These include:
- Immodest photos, showing 'awrah or meant to provoke desire
- Three-dimensional statues of living beings, which Islamweb says are forbidden with "no disagreement"
Images made to be honoured or venerated are also named as forbidden by both Islamweb and IslamQA.
And all agree that photos of trees, mountains, buildings and other things without souls are permissible, based on Ibn 'Abbas's advice. AI-generated images raise their own questions, which our guide on whether AI art is haram explains.
Can you keep photos at home if angels do not enter?
Scholars who forbid photos say you should not display pictures of living beings, while many who permit photos still advise against hanging them up. The hadith that angels do not enter a house with a picture (Sahih al-Bukhari 3225) is the same one cited for keeping dogs, which our guide on whether it is haram to have a dog discusses. Aisha's curtain shows a middle point many scholars use: the Prophet ﷺ objected to the pictures hung up, but the same cloth made into cushions was used (Sahih al-Bukhari 5954).
In practice, many families who follow the lenient view keep photos in an album or on their phone rather than on the walls, and Islamweb says "it is safer not to hang them."
How can you take pictures in a way most scholars accept?
Take photos for a real purpose, keep them modest, and avoid displaying pictures of people and animals. Practical steps:
- Photograph freely what has no soul: landscapes, food, buildings, mosques, calligraphy.
- Take photos of people for a clear need or benefit, such as ID, school, work or family records, if you follow the lenient view.
- Keep every photo modest, and never photograph someone without their consent.
- Store family photos digitally rather than printing and hanging them.
- Avoid images made to be honoured or venerated.
Whatever you decide about your camera, protect the time your phone takes. Salah Home helps you stay consistent with all five daily prayers: log each one with a tap, grow your streak, and earn Dates to build your own peaceful home.
Frequently asked questions
Is taking pictures haram in Islam?
Scholars differ. Egypt's Dar al-Ifta, Islamweb and Ibn Uthaymin held that camera photos are not the forbidden image-making, while Ibn Baz and IslamQA say photos of living beings are haram except for need. Photos of things without souls are permissible according to all.
Is it haram to take selfies?
Under the view that permits photography, a modest selfie is allowed. Scholars who forbid photos of living beings would include selfies, and immodest images are haram under every view.
Is it haram to take pictures of animals?
Scholars who forbid photos of living beings include animals. Those who permit camera photos, such as Dar al-Ifta and Islamweb, allow them when the content is free of anything prohibited.
Are passport and ID photos allowed?
Yes. Even scholars who forbid photography make an exception for need: IslamQA names identification pictures, and Ibn Baz allows photos where dire necessity calls for them.
Is it haram to have pictures on your wall?
Scholars who forbid photos say pictures of living beings should not be displayed, citing the hadith about angels in Sahih al-Bukhari 3225. Many who permit photos still advise against hanging them, and Islamweb says it is safer not to.
Sources
- Sahih al-Bukhari 5950, the severest punishment for picture makers
- Sahih al-Bukhari 5951, "Make alive what you have created"
- Sahih al-Bukhari 5954, Aisha's curtain turned into cushions
- Sahih al-Bukhari 3225, angels do not enter a house with a picture of a living creature
- Sahih Muslim 2110a, Ibn 'Abbas's advice to paint trees and lifeless things
- Egypt's Dar al-Ifta: Ruling on photography and drawing humans (2013)
- Islamweb fatwa 83249: Taking photos of animate creatures for enjoyment
- IslamQA 82366: Ibn Uthaymin on camera images
- IslamQA 10668: Taking pictures for memories
- IslamQA 174965: Pictures on phones and social media
- Ibn Baz: The ruling on depicting living beings
- Qibla.com via IslamQA.org: What do the ulema state about photography?
Related reading
- Is It Haram to Generate Images With AI? What Islam Says About AI Art6 min read
- Is Posting on TikTok and Social Media Haram? An Islamic Guide7 min read
- Is It Haram to Have a Dog?8 min read
- Is Yoga Haram?9 min read
- Is Vaping Haram? What Islamic Scholars Say About E-Cigarettes6 min read
- Is Celebrating Diwali Haram?8 min read